subscribe: Posts | Comments

Thoughts on expanding Louisiana’s official coastal footprint

30 comments

barefootonLaroadmap

Note that in conformance with the high LaCoastPost accuracy standards the image of the state seal is reversed on this graphic showing the "official" state coastal footprint

Editor’s note: Regular readers of LaCoastPost know that I’m an ardent advocate of shrinking Louisiana’s carbon footprint and expanding its coastal footprint. The latter goal is addressed in this guest post by an anonymous but highly qualified author who is currently active in quantifying landscape area and elevation in south Louisiana in great detail.

Summary

Expanding the coastal boundary for Louisiana is currently under consideration. I strongly support this effort and offer the following specific recommendation to those involved in carrying out this vital exercise.

A watershed-based system is necessary for credible predictive modeling of water flow and geographically-based coastal planning. Thus, I propose that the new Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) completed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) be used as a fundamental criterion for the expansion of the functional coastal boundary for Louisiana.

The WBD is tied to the National Hydrology Dataset (NHD), the national standard database for mapping and water quality modeling used by the US Geological Survey (USGS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This dataset was recently “certified” for Louisiana and the surrounding states.

Background

Louisiana’s official coastal boundary, created in the late 70′s and approved in the early 80′s, was clearly drawn without regard to the geological and ecological processes that influence the dynamic deltaic landscape. In other words, the current boundary is more political than science-based. Successful restoration and management of the Louisiana coast is obviously contingent on acknowledging and working within the scientific context and limits of the real world.

Official 2002 Louisiana Coastal Zone

Official 2002 Louisiana Coastal Zone

Despite a popular misconception, erosion is a significant but not primary cause of coastal land loss in the Mississippi River delta (or in the other major deltas around the world). Watershed level thinking is essential to understanding the complex interactions of hydrology (water flow), water quality and all the environmental processes that cascade through each basin and down toward the coast.

A strategy to restore the Louisiana deltaic coast using ecological engineering, hydrologic modification and wetland nourishment must comport with the laws of nature. Watershed processes are the arbiters and enforcers of those laws.

Much is made of the fact that over 40% or the continental US drains via the Mississippi River and into the Gulf of Mexico through Louisiana. This great “riverine machine” directly or indirectly created most of south Louisiana during the past seven millennia but we should not forget that coastal Louisiana is also influenced by rivers and in state headwaters not connected to the Mississippi system.

So how should the proposed expansion of the official coastal boundary of Louisiana toward a functional boundary be approached, in order to accommodate real world geophysical and ecological processes?

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) recently completed watershed mapping for the entire state of Louisiana.* The watershed boundary dataset (WBD) is comprised of polygons representing relatively small, local watersheds. Each polygon defines an area that drains the immediate area and all lands upstream of the “pour-point” (the location where the water exits the polygon and flows downstream).

These polygons make perfect management units, as they are tied to many NRCS activities and data collection programs. In addition to the USDA, other federal agencies (e.g., USGS, EPA) and state and local government agencies also recognize these boundaries. USGS maintains the nation’s streamflow gauging network and EPA is responsible for water quality and other environmental monitoring programs. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) manages the state non-point source water pollution (319) program, using these watershed boundaries.

The hydrology dataset (NHD) is being tied to the watershed boundary dataset (WBD) units. This combined dataset provides watershed management tools that link land use, agriculture, industrial, and other activities in the watershed to the flow of water through the entire system.* Some of these tools address issues such as sediment runoff, toxic and hazardous spills, industrial point source pollution, municipal sewage treatment outfalls and many other environmental impacts (including agricultural nutrient runoff, the primary cause of gulf hypoxia).

The combined hydrology dataset should be used to provide the modeling framework to evaluate planning alternatives and impacts from proposed coastal protection/restoration projects. An arbitrarily narrow designation of the new coastal boundary will not alter the influence of upstream hydrologic effects. Using the combined watershed and hydrology datasets could bring a new level of scientific objectivity to coastal planning.

Here are some objective questions to help distinguish coastal from non-coastal watersheds:

Is streamflow subject to tidal influences?

Is the watershed above or below the freshwater/saltwater interface?

What is the elevation of the main-stem water body within the watershed?

Does the watershed have a history of being influenced by storm surge?

What flora and fauna are present in the watershed (e.g., freshwater, brackish, saline species)?

What soil types are present in the watershed?

Editor’s addition: What is the mean elevation of the watershed with respect to mean sea level?

All of these questions have answers that can contribute to the development of a more realistic and comprehensive coastal area. Furthermore, by using a watershed approach, a more coherent management program can be developed that involves objective data and more complete planning alternatives.

We are attempting to manage processes that are independent of political boundaries. Management is simply the wise application of science. Determination of the specific boundary of an expanded coastal area will require deciding whether to honor Mother Nature or the more traditional agenda of the good ol’ boys (and girls).

Anonymous

Edited by Len Bahr

*The Cabin-Teele sub-watershed project in northeast Louisiana, described in an October 5 post, is a perfect example of how the use of the watershed boundary dataset could quantify the impacts on gulf hypoxia of hydrological and ecological processes far removed from south Louisiana.

  1. Thanks for all your efforts that you have put in this. Very interesting info. “He hasn’t an enemy in the world – but all his friends hate him.” by Eddie Cantor.

  2. I conceive this website has very fantastic written content posts.

  3. Hiya, I am really glad I have found this info. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossips and web and this is really frustrating. A good site with interesting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this web site, I will be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can not find it.

  4. I feel there may possibly be a couple duplicates, but an exceedingly handy record! I’ve tweeted this. Many thanks for sharing!

  5. I have learned newer and more effective things from a blog post. Yet another thing to I have found is that typically, FSBO sellers are going to reject an individual. Remember, they will prefer to not ever use your solutions. But if an individual maintain a gradual, professional partnership, offering assistance and remaining in contact for about four to five weeks, you will usually be capable of win a discussion. From there, a listing follows. Cheers

  6. Sup , I am making a new popular forum and some of your original articles would really fit in well. Am I allowed to copy and paste this article?

  7. Hiya, I’m really glad I’ve found this information. Today bloggers publish only about gossips and net and this is really annoying. A good blog with interesting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this web site, I will be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Cant find it.

  8. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you are stating and the way in which you say it.

  9. Thanks a lot for sharing this with all of us you actually recognise what you’re talking about! Bookmarked. Kindly also seek advice from my web site =). We will have a link change arrangement among us!

  10. After looking at a few of the articles on your site, I truly like your technique of writing a blog. I saved it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my web site too and tell me how you feel.

  11. Its such as you learn my mind! You appear to grasp so much about this, such as you wrote the guide in it or something. I feel that you just could do with some p.c. to drive the message house a little bit, however other than that, this is magnificent blog. A great read. I will certainly be back.

  12. Hello there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog. Is it difficult to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about creating my own but I’m not sure where to begin. Do you have any tips or suggestions? With thanks

  13. Yay google is my king assisted me to find this outstanding site ! .

  14. Hello my family member! I wish to say that this article is awesome, great written and include almost all significant infos. I¡¦d like to look more posts like this .

  15. neither can i, oh my God i wanna see it like now, but i cant damit

  16. It has changed my view towards finance market..hats off to this programe

  17. Thanks for the post! I love watching Supernatural, its my favorite television show.

  18. Brewster and Choo-Choo. Im not sure you would know the truty if hit you in the face.

  19. I used to be pondering that I have been executing a little something right up until I realized your web site. Quite a few amazing data and I am totally agree with Collin that I begun imagining to drop my rice cookers also. Cheers

  20. I definitely like and appreciate your website publish.Actually thank you! Much obliged.

  21. I just experienced a Romney interview with Stephanapolous, asking about Egypt. Can a single be livid and angry and limp for the very same time? That is exactly how I come to feel. Romney looked and sounded like he was earning an effort and hard work in self hypnosis. A few of my Comments friends are tired of my negativity. Watch that segment and tell me this is the prospect who will win the debate on this issue(or any other).

  22. I like what you guys are up too. Such smart work and reporting! Keep up the excellent works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my site

  23. A second very strong and effective post.

  24. Anonymous says:

    It’s obviously not nonsense to undertake rigorous planning of the various challenges-”yes, we can” and should engage in rigorous planning. It’s nonsense when we indiscriminately lump issues into one “coastal” box. Let’s be careful what we ask for.

  25. Anonymous says:

    To think we can have one boundary that serves many scientific, engineering, political, and economic needs is nonsense. Planning boundaries for managing coastal water quality are obviously not identical to boundaries for managing hurricane storm surge protection

    • Anonymous-
      Speaking of nonsense, the current 30 year old (political) coastal boundary implies that Dulac, Louisiana is not in the coastal zone!

      Reaching agreement on a Louisiana coastal planning zone broad enough to encompass the major issues faced by all the world’s major deltas may be difficult but it isn’t nonsense.

      Your “No we can’t” comment distills the kind of rationalization used to keep residents and elected officials of south Louisiana from acknowledging that we’re all in a single sinking lifeboat facing increasingly severe storms and fouled by our own pee.

  26. stormineaux says:

    The present expanse of the location of the Louisiana Coastal Zone (LCZ) boundry does not in any way limit the scope of the restoration and protection programs of the state – nor should it. The state’s restoration program has already planned and implemented projects which are outside of the LCZ. The LCZ boundary was established so that, pursuant to the national Coastal Zone Management Act, Louisiana could get a federally approved coastal zone management program. The program is the Louisiana Coastal Resources Program (LCRP), which was fully implemented 29 years ago. The LCRP is about regulating uses in the Coastal Zone, so expanding the LCZ will only change the area over which the state can exercise this existing regulatory authority. Further, if the idea is to develop a comprehensive watershed based coastal planning process within the LCRP, not only will the boundary need to be changed, but the statute will also have to changed to incorporate that provision.

  27. Might want to clarify that the “coastal footprint” here is not to be confused with Senator Landrieu’s remarks this summer (themselves confused) after her trip to the Netherlands. She trumpeted that the state was going to expand, not shrink its coastal footprint – in this case, the footprint of cities and industry in the vulnerable coastal areas. She confirmed this misperception by further stating that Louisiana was going to expand its coastal cities. Both remarks are at odds with reality under any plausible scenario.

    • Riverrat-
      Expanding Louisiana’s coastal boundary farther north to encompass areas that are functionally coastal, including the entire Athafalaya Basin, is long overdue. Call me naive but I can’t imagine the thoughtful readers of LaCoastPost confusing that goal with the naive concept that expanding the coastal footprint implies reclaiming former fastland that is now deep underwater.

Leave a Reply