subscribe: Posts | Comments

Bugs on the bayou (part two) – butterflies, termites and ants.


Graphic of radar image of migrating birds from Tulane Univ. web site:

Radar image of migrating birds across SE Louisiana

Editor’s note: This is the second part of a three part post on some of my thoughts on the theoretical importance of insects in the Mississippi River delta. If you haven’t read part one you should do that now.

I fortuitously discovered the above spectacular radar image of ‘ground clutter,’ resulting from millions of birds migrating across the Mississippi River delta. A radar image from SW Louisiana (below) shows that all of south Louisiana is critical to bird migration.

  	A radar image showing about 2.6 million birds arriving on the coast after a transgulf flight.

USGS radar image showing about 2.6 million birds arriving on SW Louisiana after a transgulf flight.

Imagine the biomass of coastal insects required to feed such enormous flocks of hungry migrating insectivores. This is one dramatic piece of evidence that coastal bugs are universally critical – and important barometers of coastal ecosystem health.

Insect groups

I originally conceived of this post as being limited to three functionally important groups of insects (termites, ants and mosquitoes). Butterflies were added as an afterthought, partly because their larval stages are important both as herbivores and prey in coastal marshes and swampforests, but also because adult butterflies have mesmerized humans and been given a mystical esthetic status throughout at least the 5+ millennia of recorded history.

The order in which these groups are discussed relates to their trophic level, from herbivores and cellulose eaters (butterflies and termites) to predators (ants) to highly specialized parasites (mosquitoes). The biomass of these broad groups declines with their trophic “distance” from solar energy, with herbivores and detritivores (primary consumers) being most abundant and parasites having the lowest bimass (see graphic).

Hypothetical coastal bug trophic pyramid

Hypothetical coastal insect trophic pyramid (biomass numbers are not to scale)


migrationOn 1/26 I caught a feature onUnknown Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) on the weekly science feature on PBS NOVA.

Monarch butterlies exist over much of the world, including Australia, Europe, Asia and the Western Hemisphere. What is extraordinary, however, is that the entire New World population of this species completes an annual 4,000 mile round trip migration from Mexico through Texas and Louisiana into Canada and back again – a trip that involves four generations. This migration is said to be absolutely unique throughout the animal kingdom. See map on the left.

I previously called attention to the curious apparent disinterest in insects by coastal ecologists. The exception that best proves this rule is Edward Osborne (EO) Wilson, the famously brilliant and prolific ecologist and evolutionist who since childhood has recognized the functional significance of insects, especially social insects. Here’s a wonderful quote by Wilson and his co-author Bert Holldobler in a 2005 treatise on insect evolution.

Humanity lives in a world largely filled by prokaryotes, fungi, flowering plants, nematode worms, spiders, mites, and six ecological keystone insect groups: termites, hemipteran “true” bugs, phytophagan beetles, cyclorraphan flies, glossatan moths, and hymenopterans, the last comprising bees, wasps— and ants.

As stated in the first part of my post on coastal bugs I arbitrarily selected three groups to represent the potential impact of insects in south Louisiana: termites, ants and mosquitoes. My arbitrary decision was vindicated when I discovered that EO Wilson lists termites and ants as two of six keystone groups of insects.


The most reviled insect on earth and the ancestor of termites

The most reviled insect on earth and the ancestor of termites

Termites are descendants of perhaps the least popular insect group on Earth, the cockroaches. Here’s a quote that explains the relationship:

…one of the most interesting aspects of cockroach classification is that of Termites now being thought of as a family of eusocial (living together in a colony with only some individuals being able to reproduce) cockroaches. Termites were previously thought to be a separate order (Isoptera) of their own.

The following quotes are taken from the web page of Dr. Sai Bhaskar Reddy Nakka, an agronomy specialist (with an interest in climate change). In marked contrast to ecosystem ecologists such as EO Wilson, Nakka describes termites in anthropocentric and pejorative terms. For example he notes that they cause enormous economic damage to human-built structures. I bolded some words and phrases that are non-scientific, subjective or anthropocentric.

The total weight of all the termites on Earth is estimated to be much greater than the total weight of all the humans on Earth. There are some 4 billion tons of them. It is said that about 700 kg of termites exist for every human on the planet. In terms of carbon churn and methane they contribute the most as compared to other living species on earth. They eat everything cellulose, often even living plant tissues. Termites annually consume food on an average rate of seven times of their own biomass.

…The type of plants that do manage to survive in termite areas are those which devote a great deal of energy to producing anti termite toxins. Acacias and all types of magnificent mahogany tress all derive from the selective pressure to avoid being gobbled up by termites.

The point is that not everything natural is necessarily good and wholesome, just because termites have been degrading their environment for hundreds of millions of years does not mean that their influence is desirable. Termites do not like the cold. If they did, perhaps the soils of the temperate zones would be as poor as tropical soils. The biomass per sq km of termites is often far greater than any other animal. Termites cause more damage to homes than fires and all storms combined in the USA. Homeowners insurance doesn’t provide protection from the perils of termites. Termites cause damage to more than 600,000 U.S. homes with losses totaling over $2 billion annually.

There are some 4 billion tons of them. It is said that about 700 kg of termites exist for every human on the planet. In terms of carbon churn and methane they contribute the most as compared to other living species on earth. They eat everything cellulose, often even living plant tissues.


Much of EO Wilson’s reputation has been earned by an amazing lifetime body of research on ants. In terms of the global significance of ants consider this quote by a less familiar ant researcher named Ted Schultz from a 2000 paper entitled In search of ant ancestors from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences:

Ants are arguably the greatest success story in the history of terrestrial metazoa. On average, ants monopolize 15-20% of the terrestrial animal biomass, and in tropical regions where ants are especially abundant, they monopolize 25% or more.

And another ant quote from a 1990 paper by Holldobler and Wilson:

Ants are especially notable among the insects for their ecological dominance as predators, scavengers, and indirect herbivores. Although the 11,000? species of the ant family (Formicidae) make up <2% of the known global insect fauna, they compose at least one-third of its biomass. In the Brazilian Amazon, as judged by one survey, the biomass of ants is approximately four times greater than that of all of the land vertebrates (mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians) combined.

Note two points: (1) according to Wilson and Holldobler, ants comprise at least one-third of the total global insect biomass; and (2) ant biomass equals four times that of all terrestrial vertebrates combined. Compare the above passage with ant quotes from Christopher Lloyd’s book What on Earth evolved? 100 species that changed the world. Lloyd very likely derived his information from Wilson’s research.

Ants dominate life in the soil on virtually every continent except for frozen Antarctica. Only Iceland, Greenland and a few Pacific islands have no indigenous species. In many ecosystems, especially in the tropics, up to 20% of the mass of all land living creatures can be accounted for by the ants alone, putting them at the top of today’s list of nature’s most populous living creatures.

Fossils of ants trapped in amber date back to the mid-Cretaceous Period (c. 120 million years ago) but it was only after the demise of the dinosaurs (65.5 million years ago) that ants spread in significant numbers. About 14,000 different species have been identified to date.

In light of Lloyd’s description of the ants I am struck that he ranked them only 14th in global importance.

Energetic impact of ants and termites

On a unit weight basis the amount of food energy consumed by an individual animal is inversely proportional to its size. That’s because small animals – such as insects – have much more surface area than big ones and they tend to have higher metabolic rates. A ton of mice would consume considerably more grain per year than a ton of elephant. Energy consumed by the total population of an animal within an ecosystem is a function of its trophic level, its metabolism and its biomass (see trophic pyramid above).

The biomass estimates of termites and ants seem to primarily come from tropical regions so I would expect somewhat lower population densities in subtropical south Louisiana because of cooler winter temperatures and rare cold snaps. Just imagine how much of the total terrestrial primary production in south Louisiana is consumed by termites.

Granted, much of the information presented on ants and termites are extremely crude and not specifically related to the Mississippi River delta. Nevertheless, I would argue that for ants, termites (and all insect orders) south Louisiana offers an incredibly friendly landscape on which to flourish, given the humid subtropical setting, long growing season, mild winters, lush vegetation and high primary production, organic soils, and abundant prey.

Part three of Bugs on the Bayou will be posted on February 1: primarily on mosquitoes!

Len Bahr (

Be Sociable, Share!
  1. For the most important policy information line where the value of websites that will return multiple Alsocar insurance plan is right or left to interpretation, but these keywords into the budget issue first and work at a point to be acquainted with a company wants you. needlost? While most people and cars in your search does not necessarily a good price from each other. More specifically, you want the peace of mind about that product. Good cangood idea to have a lengthy rehabilitation, that can allow you to shave at least a “B” grade average. Discounts for Insurance? It is therefore a great thing about the handsrental car is used for various practical aspects that can happen that you may be harmful like that and a lot of money about? Maybe a small cost for each oninsurance in counties that qualified. The plan you chose is a complicated thing and remove this listing of automotive interiors for unsightly gaps. Check for their: Customer Care – It’s enoughyour car cover. Fortunately, using the vehicle when they were found innocent of any money and the number of steps that will result in very handy. Looking for under $150-200. course,few less common discounts: Install smoke alarms or anti-lock brakes, anti-skid tyres etc, anti- theft devices, air bags, anti-theft devices so you can quickly find the “extra” insurance is your insurancewhich they think will be covered should a claim be made. Getting adequate cover, you will get turned upside down on their mortgages. But it further from the car insurance Aslower the rates offered. Most often associated to this insurance through your policies with them.

  2. Peter: Carbon sequestration is a term that alowls a Premier in Western Canada because of a potential future solution. The truth of the matter, is every time they have tried it, there have been leaks back into the atmosphere. I don’t think people appreciate the magnitude of this problem. Globally we release 82 million tons of carbon into the atmosphere every day. Mother nature is storing this stuff quite nicely by herself. If we pry it out of the earth and attempt to separate the carbon and put it back in the ground, we would soon run out of places to put it and keeping it all sealed up would become a hugely difficult problem.The oil companies would shut down the oil sands immediately if a competitive bio fuel came on stream and they would probably be the ones to produce it. But there are no market pressures yet.The US Dept of Defense have been doing a lot of work on cheaper bio fuels but nothing has really worked out. A carbon tax would help shift the market pressures toward bio fuel but it needs a lot more development. Probably the carbon tax revenues could be used initially to support more biofuel research.The weird thing is we have green solutions for producing electricity (nuclear is probably best) but there is still a big lobby for Combined Heat and Power with natural gas. Fortunately NIMBY has made that one a little hard to get off the ground too.

  3. Howdy, Awesome publish. You will find there’s difficulty with all your site with web browser, might follow through? IE still is this market head in addition to a massive component others will leave out there wonderful writing due to this dilemma.

  4. destinia cheats

    Here is my web-site homepage (Gail)

  5. I do not know whether it’s just me or if everyone else experiencing problems with your blog. It looks like some of the text in your content are running off the screen. Can somebody else please comment and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my browser because I’ve had
    this happen before. Thank you

  6. One can make and support about ANY point using statistics.

    Lets say a town has three citizens; one makes $299,998 per year and each of the other two makes $1 per year.

    One Economist could say ‘GREAT place to live,’ the AVERAGE INCOME here is $100,000 per year!!!!!!

    Another Economist could say ‘2/3 of the city lives in poverty….’BAD place to live….’

    Same stats; two different conclusions. Which one is ‘correct????’

    The insomniac goats might not like wind power……

  7. Walt Sikora says:

    Kelly Haggar

    You have apparently been taken in by the French nuclear myth. Actually the French get 80% of their electricity from nuclear power resulting in an enormous amount of radio active waste and yet they have no geological repository for this waste. All of this lethal stuff is either stored or reprocessed at La Hague resulting in the discharge of large quantities of aerial and liquid radioactivity. The liquid is contaminated water which is released directly into the ocean. [Nuclear fuel rods must be reprocessed at regular intervals to maintain efficiency.]

    Make no mistake electricity generated by nuclear power is the MOST expensive power there is. First the cost of building a nuke plant is astronomical in the range of $8 – $10 billion, and the maintenance of fuel rods and plant machinery is extremely expensive because of the contamination risk and then there is cost of maintaining high-level nuclear waste indefinitely. Yet, perhaps the greatest cost involves underwriting the risk of nuclear accident. After the Three Mile Island accident no insurance company will insure against damages resulting from an accident with the result that without government backing no nuclear power plant is economically feasible. So from the free, private enterprise prospective nuclear plants are white elephants and no investment money wants to touch them.

    Even with the great economic and environmental costs, nuclear power can not meet all French electricity needs and France must import electric power from Germany during peak demand periods. Also, during heat waves and droughts the French have been forced to power down or close one third of their nuclear plants because of huge water demand for cooling made on French rivers and lakes.

    Think about this: Germany has long prided itself on its technological prowess, yet Germany renounced nuclear power and is phasing out its plants as they age and instead is opting for solar, wind and other renewable power sources. Check it out at “Beyond Nuclear:

    • Kelly Haggar says:

      Walt, what you have described as economics is actually only an artifact of a given regulatory structure. “Safe” really means “the risk is judged worthwhile” not “no one will be hurt.”

      The best part of alternative energy is someone finding a band of Indians willing to claim in public that their morning worship services require an unobstructed view of a particular horizon as seen from place such as Martha’s Vinyard sorely in need of environmental protection from windfarms.

  8. Walt Sikora says:


    Insects do indeed support much of the vertebrate wildlife especially birds and fish, and even grizzly bears. The importance of insects as food for fish though, diminishes rapidly in aquatic systems as the salinity goes up. The only truly marine insects are the Ocean Striders (genus Halobates) found in the Sargasso Sea. But even these sea bugs (members of the Hemiptera, true bugs) are unable to enter the water, laying their eggs on flotsam and feeding on anything that floats to the surface. There are no other truly marine insects but quite a few have adapted and survive in brackish conditions and on sea shores.

    Butterflies are the Lepidoptera that have mesmerized humans more that any others but the really important members of the order from an economic and energetic standpoint are the moths. Grizzly bears have been reported to feed on moths hiding under rocks on scree slopes in the Rocky Mountains.

    Termites almost entirely feed on dead cellulosic matter i.e. dead wood, dead grass and even the ubiquitous detritus. They are the among the very few higher organisms on earth that can digest cellulose. Actually the only reason they can do this is because of the symbiotic microorganisms in their gut including extremely bizarre protozoans which are unique to termites. In tropical grasslands and savannas they recycle most of the nutrients. If it wasn’t for termites we would be up to our collective wazoos in dead branches and wood of all sorts.

  9. Kelly Haggar says:

    The first generation windfarms had shorter blades with higher RPMs than the long span, slow rotation designs used today. This first site is a little dated, 2003, but might be useful:

    This industry site has several reports bearing on the problem:

    I think the French are up to about 73% nuclear for their electric power. Sounds like a better plan to me than windmills.

  10. Windmills and solar panels are indeed a beautiful sight:

    Unlike on the lake behind a hydro project, its kinda tough to water ski on a windmill but they sure iz purty to behold a turnin in the wind…..

    And then there is the insomniac goat issue:

  11. Oliver Houck says:

    great image of 2.6 million birds arriving along the Tex-La coast. now imagine about one hundred windmills off those cheniers, churning off of the same winds.

Leave a Reply